Éric Vyncke nits
This commit is contained in:
parent
1e98ae4f31
commit
98e4f12efe
1 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -49,8 +49,9 @@
|
|||
<abstract>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>There is a false notion that Internet Number Resources (INRs) in
|
||||
the RPKI can be associated with the real-world identity of the 'holder'
|
||||
of an INR. This document attempts to put that notion to rest.</t>
|
||||
the RPKI can be associated with the real-world identity of the
|
||||
'holder' of an INR. This document attempts to make clear that
|
||||
notion is incorrect.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
</abstract>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -93,11 +94,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<t>It has been suggested that one could authenticate real-world
|
||||
business transactions with the signatures of INR holders. E.g.
|
||||
Bill's Bait and Sushi could use the private key attesting to that
|
||||
they are the holder of their AS in the RPKI to sign a Letter of
|
||||
Authorization (LOA) for some other party to rack and stack hardware
|
||||
owned by BB&S. Unfortunately, while this may be technically
|
||||
possible, it is neither appropriate nor meaningful.</t>
|
||||
Bill's Bait and Sushi (BB&S) could use the private key attesting
|
||||
to that they are the holder of their AS in the RPKI to sign a Letter
|
||||
of Authorization (LOA) for some other party to rack and stack
|
||||
hardware owned by BB&S. Unfortunately, while this may be
|
||||
technically possible, it is neither appropriate nor meaningful.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>The I in RPKI actually stands for "Infrastructure," as in
|
||||
Resource Public Key Infrastructure, not for "Identity". In fact,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue