diff --git a/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.xml b/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.xml
index 176cd5a..d1573cd 100644
--- a/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.xml
+++ b/draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.xml
@@ -49,8 +49,9 @@
   <abstract>
 
     <t>There is a false notion that Internet Number Resources (INRs) in
-    the RPKI can be associated with the real-world identity of the 'holder'
-    of an INR.  This document attempts to put that notion to rest.</t>
+    the RPKI can be associated with the real-world identity of the
+    'holder' of an INR.  This document attempts to make clear that
+    notion is incorrect.</t>
 
   </abstract>
 
@@ -93,11 +94,11 @@
 
     <t>It has been suggested that one could authenticate real-world
     business transactions with the signatures of INR holders.  E.g.
-    Bill's Bait and Sushi could use the private key attesting to that
-    they are the holder of their AS in the RPKI to sign a Letter of
-    Authorization (LOA) for some other party to rack and stack hardware
-    owned by BB&amp;S.  Unfortunately, while this may be technically
-    possible, it is neither appropriate nor meaningful.</t>
+    Bill's Bait and Sushi (BB&amp;S) could use the private key attesting
+    to that they are the holder of their AS in the RPKI to sign a Letter
+    of Authorization (LOA) for some other party to rack and stack
+    hardware owned by BB&amp;S.  Unfortunately, while this may be
+    technically possible, it is neither appropriate nor meaningful.</t>
 
     <t>The I in RPKI actually stands for "Infrastructure," as in
     Resource Public Key Infrastructure, not for "Identity".  In fact,