add pfs and mark
This commit is contained in:
parent
25f9a77476
commit
d5e577fc1d
1 changed files with 37 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
|
|||
</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<author fullname="Randy Bush" initials="R." surname="Bush">
|
||||
<organization>Internet Initiative Japan & Arrcus, Inc.</organization>
|
||||
<organization>IIJ Research Lab & Arrcus, Inc.</organization>
|
||||
<address>
|
||||
<postal>
|
||||
<street>1856 SW Edgewood Dr</street>
|
||||
|
|
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
|
|||
</author>
|
||||
|
||||
<author fullname="Keyur Patel" initials="K." surname="Patel">
|
||||
<organization>Arrcus</organization>
|
||||
<organization>Arrcus, Inc.</organization>
|
||||
<address>
|
||||
<postal>
|
||||
<street>2077 Gateway Place, Suite #400</street>
|
||||
|
|
@ -45,7 +45,34 @@
|
|||
<email>keyur@arrcus.com</email>
|
||||
</address>
|
||||
</author>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<author fullname="Philip Smith" initials="P." surname="Smith">
|
||||
<organization>PFS Internet Development Pty Ltd</organization>
|
||||
<address>
|
||||
<postal>
|
||||
<street>PO Box 1908</street>
|
||||
<city>Milton</city>
|
||||
<region>QLD</region>
|
||||
<code>4064</code>
|
||||
<country>Australia</country>
|
||||
</postal>
|
||||
<email>pfsinoz@gmail.com</email>
|
||||
</address>
|
||||
</author>
|
||||
|
||||
<author fullname="Mark Tinka" initials="M." surname="Tinka">
|
||||
<organization>SEACOM</organization>
|
||||
<address>
|
||||
<postal>
|
||||
<street>Building 7, Design Quarter District, Leslie Avenue, Magaliessig</street>
|
||||
<city>Fourways, Gautang</city>
|
||||
<code>2196</code>
|
||||
<country>South Africa</country>
|
||||
</postal>
|
||||
<email>mark.tinka@seacom.com</email>
|
||||
</address>
|
||||
</author>
|
||||
|
||||
<date />
|
||||
|
||||
<abstract>
|
||||
|
|
@ -87,8 +114,8 @@
|
|||
target="RFC7313"/> from its neighbors to recover the paths which
|
||||
might be covered by these new VRPs. This will be perceived as
|
||||
rude by those neighbors as it passes a serious resource burden on
|
||||
to them. This document suggests marking but keeping Invalidated
|
||||
paths so the Route Refresh is no longer needed.
|
||||
to them. This document recommends implementations keep but mark
|
||||
Invalidated paths so the Route Refresh is no longer needed.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
@ -108,14 +135,16 @@
|
|||
<section anchor="ops" title="Operational Considerations">
|
||||
|
||||
<t>
|
||||
Operators deploying ROV SHOULD ensure that the router implemention
|
||||
Operators deploying ROV SHOULD ensure that the router implementation
|
||||
is not causing unnecessary Route Refresh requests to neighbors.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>
|
||||
If the router does not implement the recommendations here, the
|
||||
operator SHOULD enable "soft reconfiguration inbound," and check
|
||||
that this stops unnecessary Route Refresh requests to neighbors.
|
||||
operator SHOULD enable "soft reconfiguration inbound," which
|
||||
should cause the Adj-RIB-In to be effectively kept. The operator
|
||||
should then ensure that this stops unnecessary Route Refresh
|
||||
requests to neighbors.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue