flesh out acee and l3dl/lsoe a bit more
This commit is contained in:
parent
939e2502dd
commit
f79d3cc9cb
2 changed files with 141 additions and 35 deletions
|
|
@ -194,11 +194,17 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
|||
|
||||
[I-D.acee-idr-lldp-peer-discovery] describes how to use the LLDP IETF
|
||||
Organizationally Specific TLV to augment the LLDP TLV set to
|
||||
transport BGP Config Sub-TLVs signaling AFI, IP address (IPv4 or
|
||||
IPv6), Local ASs, Local BGP Identifier (aka, BGP Router ID), Session
|
||||
Group-ID, BGP [Authentication] Session Capabilities, and Local
|
||||
Address (Next Hop). Which iof these are really necessary could be
|
||||
discussed.
|
||||
transport BGP Config Sub-TLVs signaling
|
||||
|
||||
o AFI,
|
||||
o IP address (IPv4 or IPv6),
|
||||
o Local ASs,
|
||||
o Local BGP Identifier (AKA, BGP Router ID),
|
||||
o Session Group-ID,
|
||||
o BGP [Authentication] Session Capabilities, and
|
||||
o Local Address (Next Hop).
|
||||
|
||||
Which of these are really necessary could be discussed.
|
||||
|
||||
7.2. Layer-3 Discovery Protocol (L3dl)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -208,16 +214,10 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
|||
abilities, and link liveness which may then be disseminated using
|
||||
BGP-SPF and similar protocols.
|
||||
|
||||
This is similar but not quite the sane as the needs of this IDR
|
||||
Design Team. E.g., the result is likely more complex than is needed.
|
||||
A week's work could customize the design for the IDR Design Team's
|
||||
needs. But ...
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike LLDP, L3DL has only one implementation and is not widely
|
||||
deployed.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
L3DL Upper Layer Protocol Configuration, [I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc],
|
||||
details signaling the minimal set of parameters needed to start a BGP
|
||||
session with a discovered peer. Details such as loopback peering are
|
||||
handled by attributes in the L3DL protocol itself.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -226,6 +226,19 @@ Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 4]
|
|||
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
o AS number,
|
||||
o IP address, IPv4 or IPv6, and
|
||||
o BGP Authentication.
|
||||
|
||||
This is similar but not quite the sane as the needs of this IDR
|
||||
Design Team. E.g., L3DL is designed to meet more complex needs.
|
||||
L3DL's reedecesor, LSOE, [I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe], was simpler and might
|
||||
be a better candidate for adaptation. A week's work could customize
|
||||
the design for the IDR Design Team's needs. But ...
|
||||
|
||||
Unlike LLDP, L3DL has only one implementation, and LSOE only one open
|
||||
source implementation, and neither is significantly deployed.
|
||||
|
||||
8. Discovery at Layer Three
|
||||
|
||||
Discovery at Layer-3 can assume IP addressability, though the IP
|
||||
|
|
@ -262,6 +275,13 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
|||
Rendezvous approaches may appeal to deployments which favor a central
|
||||
control framework.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, those who favor distributed protocols will have
|
||||
the classic worries about fragility, redundancy, reliability, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -273,15 +293,6 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
|||
|
||||
The IDR BGP Discovery Design Team.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
12. IANA Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
None
|
||||
|
|
@ -299,6 +310,16 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
|||
and Liveness", draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl-04 (work in progress),
|
||||
May 2020.
|
||||
|
||||
[I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc]
|
||||
Bush, R. and K. Patel, "L3DL Upper Layer Protocol
|
||||
Configuration", draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc-03 (work in
|
||||
progress), May 2020.
|
||||
|
||||
[I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe]
|
||||
Bush, R., Austein, R., and K. Patel, "Link State Over
|
||||
Ethernet", draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (work in progress),
|
||||
November 2018.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The
|
||||
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830,
|
||||
DOI 10.17487/RFC6830, January 2013,
|
||||
|
|
@ -308,6 +329,15 @@ Appendix A. Acknowledgements
|
|||
|
||||
The authors wish to thank .
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
Randy Bush
|
||||
|
|
@ -333,4 +363,30 @@ Author's Address
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 6]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 7]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue