From fb22ae36d4ebfbf858a13a30ff0a51fab3e69e89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Randy Bush Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 12:55:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] first skeleton cut --- draft-ymbk-rpki-has-no-identity.xml | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 draft-ymbk-rpki-has-no-identity.xml diff --git a/draft-ymbk-rpki-has-no-identity.xml b/draft-ymbk-rpki-has-no-identity.xml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..057de66 --- /dev/null +++ b/draft-ymbk-rpki-has-no-identity.xml @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The I in RPKI does not stand for Identity + + + Arrcus & Internet Initiative Japan +
+ + 5147 Crystal Springs + Bainbridge Island + WA + 98110 + US + + randy@psg.com +
+ + + + + + + There is a false notion that internet number resource in the RPKI + can be associated with the real world identity of the 'owner' of an + internet number resource. This document attempts to put that notion + to rest. + + + + + + The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", + "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and + "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in + BCP 14 when, + and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. + + + + + + + +
+ + The Template for a Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for the + Resource PKI (RPKI) Section 3.1, Naming, + makes very clear that "The Subject name in each certificate SHOULD + NOT be "meaningful;" and goes on to do so at some length. + +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ +
+ + The authors thank George Michaelson and Job Snijders for lively + discussion. + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +