randy/draft-rpki-has-no-identity
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

cleaning out typographic space

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2021-03-15 19:25:21 -07:00
parent 28c190defc
commit 13c178b736
1 changed files with 13 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
draft-ymbk-sidrops-rpki-has-no-identity.xml
View file

@ -59,11 +59,12 @@
<note title="Requirements Language">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref target="RFC8174"/> when,
and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.</t>
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED",
"MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as
described in BCP 14 <xref target="RFC2119"/> <xref
target="RFC8174"/> when, and only when, they appear in all capitals,
as shown here.</t>
</note>
@ -106,7 +107,7 @@
<section anchor="bottom" title="The Bottom Line">
<t>The RPKI was designed and specified to sign certificates for use
within the RPKI itself　and to generate Route Origin Authorizations
within the RPKI itself and to generate Route Origin Authorizations
(ROAs), <xref target="RFC6480"/>, for use in routing. It's design
intentionally precluded use for attesting to real world identity as,
among other issues, it would expose the Certification Authority (CA)