some edits caused by ties reading
This commit is contained in:
parent
130ba8f2ad
commit
5e4fc9d424
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
|
|||
neighbors to recover the paths which might be covered by these new
|
||||
RPKI data. This will be perceived as rude by those neighbors as
|
||||
it passes a serious resource burden on to them. This document
|
||||
recommends implementations keep but mark paths affected by
|
||||
recommends implementations keep and mark paths affected by
|
||||
RPKI-based policy so Route Refresh is no longer needed.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -179,8 +179,8 @@
|
|||
When RPKI data cause one or more paths to be dropped, withdrawn,
|
||||
or merely not chosen as best path due to RPKI-based policy (ROV,
|
||||
ASPA, etc.), those paths MUST be saved and marked (to not be used
|
||||
for best path evaluation etc.) so that later VRPs can reevaluate
|
||||
them against then current policy.
|
||||
for best path evaluation etc.) so that later RPKI data can
|
||||
reevaluate those paths.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>
|
||||
|
|
@ -280,7 +280,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<t>
|
||||
The authors wish to thank Ben Maddison, John Heasley, Nick
|
||||
Hilliard, John Scudder, Matthias Waehlisch, and Saku Ytti.
|
||||
Hilliard, Ties de Kock. John Scudder, Matthias Waehlisch, and Saku
|
||||
Ytti.
|
||||
</t>
|
||||
|
||||
</section>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue