-01 with stronger reccos and seccons

This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2021-11-12 13:40:08 -08:00
parent f27bab03fb
commit 3d02593371

View file

@ -80,6 +80,7 @@
<t>
A BGP Speaker performing RPKI-based Route Origin Validation should
not issue Route Refresh to its neighbors when receiving new VRPs.
A method for avoiding doing so is described.
</t>
</abstract>
@ -122,17 +123,20 @@
<section anchor="related" title="Related Work">
<t>It is assumed that the reader understands BGP, <xref
target="RFC4271"/> and Route Refresh <xref target="RFC7313"/>, the
RPKI <xref target="RFC6480"/>, Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs),
<xref target="RFC6482"/>, The Resource Public Key Infrastructure
(RPKI) to Router Protocol <xref target="I-D.ietf-sidrops-8210bis"/>,
RPKI-based Prefix Validation, <xref target="RFC6811"/>, and Origin
Validation Clarifications, <xref target="RFC8481"/>.</t>
<t>
It is assumed that the reader understands BGP, <xref
target="RFC4271"/> and Route Refresh <xref target="RFC7313"/>, the
RPKI <xref target="RFC6480"/>, Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs),
<xref target="RFC6482"/>, The Resource Public Key Infrastructure
(RPKI) to Router Protocol <xref
target="I-D.ietf-sidrops-8210bis"/>, RPKI-based Prefix Validation,
<xref target="RFC6811"/>, and Origin Validation Clarifications,
<xref target="RFC8481"/>.
</t>
</section>
</section>
<section anchor="ops" title="Operational Considerations">
<section anchor="ops" title="Operational Recommendations">
<t>
Routers MUST either keep the full Adj-RIB-In or implement this
@ -155,16 +159,22 @@
<t>
If the router has insufficient resources to support this, it
SHOULD not be used for Route Origin Validation.
MUST not be used for Route Origin Validation.
</t>
</section>
<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
<section anchor="Security" title="Security Considerations">
<t>
This document adds no additional security considerations to those
already described by the referenced documents.
This document describes a denial of service Route Origin
Validation may place on a BGP neighbor, and describes how it may
be ameliorated.
</t>
<t>
Otherwise, this document adds no additional security considerations
to those already described by the referenced documents.
</t>
</section>
@ -196,6 +206,7 @@
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.6480.xml"?>
</references>
<!--
<section anchor="Acknowledgements" title="Acknowledgements">
<t>
@ -203,6 +214,7 @@
</t>
</section>
-->
</back>