Layer-3 Neighbor Discovery Arrcus & Internet Initiative Japan
5147 Crystal Springs Bainbridge Island WA 98110 US randy@psg.com
Vigil Security, LLC
516 Dranesville Road Herndon VA 20170 USA housley@vigilsec.com
Arrcus, Inc
sra@hactrn.net
Hickory Hill Consulting
7453 Hickory Hill Saline MI 48176 USA +1-734-604-0332 shares@ndzh.com
Arrcus
2077 Gateway Place, Suite #400 San Jose CA 95119 US keyur@arrcus.com
Data Centers where the topology is BGP-based need to discover neighbor IP addressing, IP Layer-3 BGP neighbors, etc. This Layer-3 Neighbor Discovery protocol identifies BGP neighbor candidates. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.
The Massive Data Center (MDC) environment presents unusual problems of scale, e.g. O(10,000) forwarding devices, while its homogeneity presents opportunities for simple approaches. Layer-3 Discovery and Liveness (L3DL), , provides neighbor discovery at Layer-2. This document (set) provides a similar solution at Layer-3, attempting to be as similar as reasonable to L3DL. Layer-3 Neighbor Discovery (L3ND) provides brutally simple mechanisms for neighboring devices to Discover each other's IP Addresses, Discover mutually supported layer-3 encapsulations, e.g. IP/MPLS, Discover Layer-3 IP and/or MPLS addressing of interfaces of the encapsulations, Provide for authenticity and verification of protocol messages. In this document, the use case for L3ND is for point to point links in a datacenter Clos ()in order to exchange the data needed for bootstrapping BGP-based peering. Once IP connectivity has been leveraged to get layer-3 addressability and forwarding capabilities, normal IP forwarding and routing can take over. L3ND might be found to be more widely applicable to a range of routing and similar protocols which need Layer-3 neighbor discovery.
Even though it concentrates on the inter-device layer, this document relies heavily on routing terminology. The following attempts to clarify the use of some possibly confusing terms: A hierarchic subset of a crossbar switch topology commonly used in data centers . The L3ND content of a single Layer-3 UDP Datagram. Address Family Indicator and Subsequent Address Family Indicator (AFI/SAFI). I.e. classes of layer-2.5 and 3 addresses such as IPv4, IPv6, MPLS, etc. A logical connection between two interfaces on two devices. E.g. two VLANs between the same two ports are two links. Massive Data Center, commonly composed of thousands of Top of Rack Switches (TORs). Maximum Transmission Unit, the size in octets of the largest packet that can be sent on a medium, see 1.3.3. Protocol Data Unit, an L3DL application layer message. A PDU's content may need to be broken into multiple Datagrams to make it through MTU or other restrictions. An established, via exchange of OPEN PDUs, session between two L3ND capable IP interfaces on a link, Top Of Rack switch, aggregates the servers in a rack and connects to aggregation layers of the Clos tree, AKA the Clos spine.
L3ND is primarily designed for a Clos type datacenter scale and topology, but can accommodate richer topologies which contain potential cycles. While L3ND is designed for the MDC, there are no inherent reasons it could not run on a WAN. The authentication and authorization needed to run safely on a WAN need to be considered, and the appropriate level of security options chosen. The number of addresses of one Encapsulation type on an interface link may be quite large given a TOR switch with tens of servers, each server having a few hundred micro-services, resulting in an inordinate number of addresses. And highly automated micro-service migration can cause serious address prefix disaggregation, resulting in interfaces with thousands of disaggregated prefixes. To meet such scaling needs, the L3ND protocol is session oriented and uses incremental announcement and withdrawal with session restart, a la BGP ().
Devices discover each other's IP Addresses on logical links using Multicast and Unicast UDP The main body of the protocol runs over TCP, normally with TLS Further IP Address reachability may be exchanged IP Encapsulation data are exchanged A BGP-like upper layer protocol is assumed to use the identifiers and encapsulation data to discover and build a topology database using BGP
+-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | Device | | Device | | Device | | | | | | | |+-----------------+| |+-----------------+| |+-----------------+| || || || || || || || BGP <+---+> BGP <+---+> BGP || || || || || || || |+--------^--------+| |+--------^--------+| |+--------^--------+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |+--------+--------+| |+--------+--------+| |+--------+--------+| || Encapsulations || || Encapsulations || || Encapsulations || || & Addresses || || & Addresses || || & Addresses || |+--------^--------+| |+--------^--------+| |+--------^--------+| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |+--------v--------+| |+--------v--------+| |+--------v--------+| || || || || || || ||Inter-Device PDUs<+---+>Inter-Device PDUs<+---+>Inter-Device PDUs|| || || || || || || |+-----------------+| |+-----------------+| |+-----------------+| +-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+
There are two protocols, the inter-device (left-right in the diagram) per-link layer-3 discovery and the API to the upper level BGP-like routing protocol (up-down in the above diagram): A device broadcasts a Layer-3 Multicast UDP datagram (HELLO) containing the port number that is willing to serve a TLS or raw TCP connection to support the data exchange of the rest of the protocol in a reliable and preferably authenticated manner. Another device on the link then establishes a TLS or raw TCP session in which inter-device PDUs are used to exchange device and logical link identities and layer-2.5 (MPLS) and 3 identifiers (not payloads), e.g. more IP Addresses, loopback addresses, port identities, and Encapsulations. A L3DL extension, describes the next upper layer L3DL protocol to exchange BGP parameter information. The upper layer BGP family routing protocols cross all the devices, but are not part of these L3ND protocols.
Two devices discover each other and their respective IP identities by one sending a Multicast UDP HELLO PDU (), and an other responds by attempting a TLS or raw TCP connection. To assure discovery of new devices coming up on a multi-link topology, devices on such a topology, and only on a multi-link topology, send periodic HELLOs forever, see . A device receivinga HELLO attempts to negotiate and establish a TCP, preferably TLS, session to the server at the source IP addresses of the received HELLO on the port advertised in the HELLO. Given the TCP/TLS session, OPEN PDUs () are exchanged, the Encapsulations () configured on an end point may be announced and modified. Note that these are only the encapsulation and addresses configured on the announcing interface; though a device's loopback and overlay interface(s) may also be announced.
The HELLO, , is a priming message sent on all logical links configured for L3ND. It is a small L3ND Multicast UDP PDU with the simple goal of advertising a TLS/TCP service available on an advertised port on the sending IP interface. The HELLO PDU is either IPv4 or IPv6, which selects the AFI to be used for the rest of the session(s) between end-points. Two endpoints MAY establish a link for each AFI. An interface on the link receiving the HELLO PDU attempts to establish a TLS or raw TCP, as specified by the HELLO, session to the source IP address of the HELLO on the port advertised in the HELLO. The OPEN, PDUs, used to exchange details about the L3ND session, and the ACK/ERROR PDU, are mandatory; other PDUs are optional; though at least one encapsulation SHOULD be agreed at some point. Like Multi-Protocol BGP, , an L3ND session running over one AFI MAY carry encapsulations etc. of different AFIs, The following is a ladder-style diagram of the L3ND protocol exchanges:
| HELLO | Logical Link Peer discovery |---------------------------->| | TCP OPEN | Mandatory |<----------------------------| | | | | | OPEN | IDs, security, etc. |---------------------------->| | ACK | |<----------------------------| | | | OPEN | Mandatory |<----------------------------| | ACK | |---------------------------->| | | | | | Interface IPv4 Addresses | Interface IPv4 Addresses |---------------------------->| Optional | ACK | |<----------------------------| | | | Interface IPv4 Addresses | |<----------------------------| | ACK | |---------------------------->| | | | | | Interface IPv6 Addresses | Interface IPv6 Addresses |---------------------------->| Optional | ACK | |<----------------------------| | | | Interface IPv6 Addresses | |<----------------------------| | ACK | |---------------------------->| | | | | | Interface MPLSv4 Labels | Interface MPLSv4 Labels |---------------------------->| Optional | ACK | |<----------------------------| | | | Interface MPLSv4 Labels | Interface MPLSv4 Labels |<----------------------------| Optional | ACK | |---------------------------->| | | | | | Interface MPLSv6 Labels | Interface MPLSv6 Labels |---------------------------->| Optional | ACK | |<----------------------------| | | | Interface MPLSv6 Labels | Interface MPLSv6 Labels |<----------------------------| Optional | ACK | |---------------------------->|
The basic L3ND application layer PDU is a typical TLV (Type Length Value) PDU. As it is transported over TCP, integrity is assured. When it is transported over TLS, authenticity is also provided.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ ~ Payload ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The fields of the basic L3ND header are as follows: An integer differentiating versions of the L3ND protocol. Currently only Version 0 MAY BE specified. An integer differentiating PDU payload types. See . Total number of octets in the Payload field. The application layer content of the L3ND PDU.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 0 | Payload Length = 24 ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Flags | Port ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Flags (bit): 0 - 0 Raw TCP, 1 TLS 1 - 0 Self-Signed Cert for TLS, CA-based
The Payload Length is 24 to cover the Flags and Port fields. The Port is the TCP Port Number (TBD3) on which the HELLO sender MUST have a waiting TLS/TCP (as specified in Flags) server listening. Though the IANA assigned well-known port SHOULD be used, this field allows configuration of alternate ports. The HELLO PDU is unique in that it is encapsulated in a multicast UDP packet. It offers TLS/TCP service to peers on a link. See for why multicast is used. The HELLO PDU is an IPv4 or IPv6 UDP PDU sent to a link-local multicast address. It solicits a unicast TLS/TCP open request(s) of the same AFI from other devices on the link. The IPv4 UDP packets are sent to the IPv4 link local multicast address (TBD1) and the IPv6 UDP packets are sent to an IPv6 link Local multicast address (TBD2). All L3ND PDUs other than HELLO are sent via TLS/TCP, as the peer's destination IP address is known after the HELLO. When an interface is turned up on a device, it SHOULD issue a HELLO if it is to participate in L3ND sessions and repeat HELLOs at a configured interval, with a default of 60 seconds. If the configured multicast destination address is one that is propagated by switches, the HELLO SHOULD be repeated at a configured interval, with a default of 60 seconds. This allows discovery by new devices which come up on the mesh. In this multi-link scenario, the operator should be aware of the trade-off between timer tuning and network noise and adjust the inter-HELLO timer accordingly. The source IP address of the HELLO is the address offering TLS/TCP service, and responses MUST be unicast TLS/TCP client session open requests to it using the same AFI. If more than one device responds, one adjacency is formed for each unique source IP address. L3ND treats each adjacency as a separate logical link. When a HELLO is received from a source IP address with which there is no established L3ND session, the receiver SHOULD respond by sending a TLS/TCP client session open request to the source IP address of the HELLO to establish an L3ND TLS/TCP session. To ameliorate possible load spikes during bootstrap or event recovery, there SHOULD be a jittered delay between receipt of a HELLO and TLS/TCP openb. The default delay range SHOULD be zero to five seconds, and MUST be configurable. If a HELLO is received from an IP Address with which there is an established session for that AFI, the HELLO should be dropped. A device with a TLS/TCP listener SHOULD log or otherwise report repeated failed inbound attempts.
If the receiver of a HELLO does not agree with the sender's choice of TCP/TLS or does not agree with the verification choice, Self-Signed or CA-based, the receiver SHOULD respond with a HELLO specifying its preferences. As it is assumed that the configured deployment of a data center would have compatible parameters on all devices, any disagreement over TLS/TCP or trust anchors MUST be logged. If the receiver of a HELLO agrees with the sender's choice of TLS/TCP and authentication, both sides have agreed on an AFI for the transport and on each other's IP address in that AFI. This is sufficient to open a TCP session between them, which will allow for very large data PDUs while obviating the need to invent complex transports. The server, the sender of the HELLO, listens on the advertised port for the TLS/TCP session open. The receiver of the accptable HELLO, the TCP/TLS client, initiates a TLS or raw TCP session with the sender of the HELLO, the TLS/TCP server, preferably TLS, as negotiated. If TLS, the client chooses either a self-signed certificate or one configured from the operational CA trusted by both parties, as negotiated in the HELLO exchange. If the TLS/TCP session is established, and the link is configured as point to point, the client side SHOULD stop listening on any port for which it has sent a HELLO. The server side SHOULD stop sending HELLOs. If the TLS/TCP open fails, then this SHOULD be logged and the parties MUST go back to the initial state and try HELLO. Should an interface with an established TLS/TCP session be reconfigured changing the TLS/TCP parameters, the TLS/TCP session should be torn down and the devices should restart/resume HELLOs. Once the TLS/TCP session has been established, the two devices exchange L3ND PDUs, starting with OPENs.
Each device has learned the other's IP Address from the HELLO exchange, see and established a TLS/TCP session for a particular AFI. The first PDU each sends MUST be an OPEN, and the other side MUST respond with an ACK PDU.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 2 | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Nonce ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | AttrCount | ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + ~ Attribute List ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Serial Number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The Payload Length is the number of octets in all fields of the PDU from the Nonce through the Serial Number. The Nonce enables detection of a duplicate OPEN PDU. It SHOULD be either a random number or a high resolution timestamp. It is needed to prevent session closure due to a repeated OPEN caused by a race or a dropped or delayed ACK. AttrCount is the number of attributes in the Attribute List. A node may send zero or more attributes. Attributes are single octets the semantics of which are operator-defined, e.g.: spine, leaf, backbone, route reflector, arabica, .... Attribute syntax and semantics are local to an operator or datacenter; hence there is no global registry. Nodes exchange their attributes only in the OPEN PDU. Unlike L3DL , there are no verifyable keys in the PDUs. If the operator wants authentication, integrity, etc. TLS MUST be configured. The Serial Number is a monotonically increasing 32-bit value representing the sender's state at the time of sending the last PDU. It may be an integer, a timestamp, etc. If incrementing the Serial Number would cause it to be zero, it should be incremented again. On session restart (new OPEN), a receiver MAY send the last received Serial Number to tell the sender to only send data with a Serial Number greater (in the sense), or send a Serial Number of zero to request all data. This allows a sender of an OPEN to tell the receiver that the sender would like to resume a session and that the receiver only needs to send data starting with the PDU with the lowest Serial Number greater (in the sense) than the one sent in the OPEN. If the sender is not trying to resume a dropped session, the Serial Number MUST be zero. If the receiver of an OPEN PDU with a non-zero Serial Number can not resume from the requested point, it should return an ACK with an Error Code of 2, Session could not be continued. The sender of the failing OPEN PDU SHOULD then send an OPEN PDU with a Serial Number of zero. If a sender of OPEN does not receive an ACK of the OPEN PDU in a configurable time (default 30 seconds), then they MUST resend the same OPEN PDU, with the same Nonce. Resending an unacknowledged OPEN PDU, like other ACKed PDUs, SHOULD use exponential back-off, see . If an OPEN arrives at L3ND speaker A from B with which A believes it already has an L3ND session (i.e. OPENs have already been exchanged), and the Serial Number in B's OPEN PDU is non-zero, speaker A SHOULD establish a new sending session by sending an OPEN with the Serial Number being the same as that of A's last sent and ACKed PDU. A MUST resume sending encapsulations etc. subsequent to the requested Sequence Number. And B MUST retain all previously discovered encapsulation and other data received from A. If an OPEN arrives at L3ND speaker A from B with which A believes it already has an L3ND session (i.e. OPENs have already been exchanged), and the Serial Number in B's OPEN is zero, then the A MUST assume that B's internal state has been reset. All Previously discovered encapsulation data MUST BE discarded; and A MUST respond with a new OPEN with a Serial Number of zero. TCP KeepAlives should be configured and tuned to meet local operational needs.
The ACK PDU acknowledges receipt of a PDU and reports any error condition which might have been raised.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 3 | Payload Length = 5 ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | ACKed PDU | EType | ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ Error Code | Error Hint | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The ACK acknowledges receipt of an OPEN, Encapsulation, Vendor PDU, etc. The ACKed PDU is the PDU Type of the PDU being acknowledged, e.g., OPEN, one of the Encapsulations, etc. If there was an error processing the received PDU, then the EType is non-zero. If the EType is zero, Error Code and Error Hint MUST also be zero. A non-zero EType is the receiver's way of telling the PDU's sender that the receiver had problems processing the PDU. The Error Code and Error Hint will tell the sender more detail about the error. The decimal value of EType gives a strong hint how the receiver sending the ACK believes things should proceed: 0 - No Error, Error Code and Error Hint MUST be zero 1 - Warning, something not too serious happened, continue 2 - Session should not be continued, try to restart 3 - Restart is hopeless, call the operator 4-15 - Reserved The Error Codes, noting protocol failures, are listed in . Someone stuck in the 1990s might think the catenation of EType and Error Code as an echo of 0x1zzz, 0x2zzz, etc. They might be right; or not. The Error Hint, an arbitrary 16 bits, is any additional data the sender of the error PDU thinks will help the recipient or the debugger with the particular error.
If a PDU sender expects an ACK, e.g. for an OPEN, an Encapsulation, a Vendor PDU, etc., and does not receive the ACK for a configurable time (default three seconds), and the interface and TLS/TCP session are live, the sender resends the PDU using exponential back-off, see . This cycle MAY be repeated a configurable number of times (default three) before it is considered a failure. The session MAY BE considered closed in this case of this ACK failure, and both sides revert to HELLO state. If the link is broken below layer-3, retransmission MAY BE retried when the link is restored.
Once the devices know each other's IP Addresses, and have established a TCP/TLS session and have successfully exchanged OPENs, the L3ND session is considered established, and the devices SHOULD exchange L3 interface encapsulations, L3 addresses, and L2.5 labels. Encapsulations of any AFI/SAFI may be exchanged over a TCP/TLS session irrespective of the AFI/SAFI of the session transport. The Encapsulation types the peers exchange may be IPv4 (), IPv6 (), MPLS IPv4 (), MPLS IPv6 (), and/or possibly others not defined here. The sender of an Encapsulation PDU MUST NOT assume that the peer is capable of the same Encapsulation Type. An ACK () merely acknowledges receipt. Only if both peers have sent the same Encapsulation Type is it safe for Layer-3 protocols to assume that they are compatible for that type. A receiver of an encapsulation might recognize an addressing conflict, such as both ends of the link trying to use the same address. In this case, the receiver MUST respond with an error (Error Code 2) ACK. As there may be other usable addresses or encapsulations, this error might log and continue, letting an upper layer topology builder deal with what works. Further, to consider a logical link of a type to formally be established so that it may be pushed up to upper layer protocols, the addressing for the type must be compatible, e.g. on the same IP subnet.
The header for all encapsulation PDUs is as follows:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Count ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Encapsulation List... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
An Encapsulation PDU describes zero or more addresses of the encapsulation type. The 24-bit Count is the number of Encapsulations in the Encapsulation list. The Serial Number is a monotonically increasing 32-bit value representing the sender's state in time. It may be an integer, a timestamp, etc. On session restart (new OPEN), a receiver MAY send the last received Session Number to tell the sender to only send newer data. If a sender has multiple links on the same interface, separate state: data, ACKs, etc. must be kept for each peer session. Over time, multiple Encapsulation PDUs may be sent for an interface in a session as configuration changes. The Receiver MUST acknowledge the Encapsulation PDU with a Type=3, ACK PDU () with the Encapsulation Type being that of the encapsulation being announced, see . If the Sender does not receive an ACK in a configurable interval (default three seconds), they SHOULD retransmit. After a user configurable number of failures (default three), the L3ND session should be considered dead and the HELLO process SHOULD be restarted. If the link is broken below layer-3, retransmission MAY BE retried if data have not changed in the interim and the TCP/TLS session is still alive.
The Encapsulation Flags are a sequence of bit fields as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 ... 7 +------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+ | Ann/With | Primary | Under/Over | Loopback | Reserved ..| +------------+------------+------------+------------+------------+
Each encapsulation in an Encapsulation PDU of Type T may announce new and/or withdraw old encapsulations of Type T. It indicates this with the Ann/With Encapsulation Flag, Announce == 1, Withdraw == 0. Each Encapsulation interface address in an Encapsulation PDU is either a new encapsulation be announced (Ann/With == 1) (yes, a la BGP) or requests one be withdrawn (Ann/With == 0). Adding an encapsulation which already exists SHOULD raise an Announce/Withdraw Error (see ); the EType SHOULD be 2, suggesting a session restart (see so all encapsulations will be resent. If an LLEI has multiple addresses for an encapsulation type, one and only one address MAY be marked as primary (Primary Flag == 1) for that Encapsulation Type. An Encapsulation interface address in an Encapsulation PDU MAY be marked as a loopback, in which case the Loopback bit is set. Loopback addresses are generally not seen directly on an external interface. One or more loopback addresses MAY be exposed by configuration on one or more L3ND speaking external interfaces, e.g. for iBGP peering. They SHOULD be marked as such, Loopback Flag == 1. Each Encapsulation interface address in an Encapsulation PDU is that of the direct 'underlay interface (Under/Over == 1), or an 'overlay' address (Under/Over == 0), likely that of a VM or container guest bridged or configured on to the interface already having an underlay address.
The IPv4 Encapsulation describes a device's ability to exchange IPv4 packets on one or more subnets. It does so by stating the interface's addresses and the corresponding prefix lengths.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 4 | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Count ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Encaps Flags | IPv4 Address ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | PrefixLen | more ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The 24-bit Count is the sum of the number of IPv4 Encapsulations being announced and/or withdrawn.
The IPv6 Encapsulation describes a link's ability to exchange IPv6 packets on one or more subnets. It does so by stating the interface's addresses and the corresponding prefix lengths.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 5 | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Count ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Encaps Flags | ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ + | ~ + + ~ ~ + + ~ IPv6 Prefix ~ + +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | PrefixLen | more ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The 24-bit Count is the sum of the number of IPv6 Encapsulations being announced and/or withdrawn.
As an MPLS enabled interface may have a label stack, see , a variable length list of labels is needed. These are the labels the sender will accept for the prefix to which the list is attached.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Label Count | Label | Exp |S| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ Label | Exp |S| more ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
A Label Count of zero is an implicit withdraw of all labels for that prefix on that interface.
The MPLS IPv4 Encapsulation describes a logical link's ability to exchange labeled IPv4 packets on one or more subnets. It does so by stating the interface's addresses the corresponding prefix lengths, and the corresponding labels which will be accepted for each address.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 6 | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Count ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Encaps Flags | MPLS Label List ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | IPv4 Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | PrefixLen | more ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The 24-bit Count is the sum of the number of MPLSv4 Encapsulation being announced and/or withdrawn.
The MPLS IPv6 Encapsulation describes a logical link's ability to exchange labeled IPv6 packets on one or more subnets. It does so by stating the interface's addresses, the corresponding prefix lengths, and the corresponding labels which will be accepted for each address.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 7 | Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Count ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Encaps Flags | MPLS Label List ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | ~ + + ~ ~ + IPv6 Address + ~ ~ + + ~ | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Prefix Len | more ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
The 24-bit Count is the sum of the number of MPLSv6 Encapsulations being announced and/or withdrawn.
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Version = 0 | PDU Type = 255| Payload Length ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Serial Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Enterprise Number ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ~ | Ent Type | Enterprise Data ... ~ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Vendors or enterprises may define TLVs beyond the scope of L3ND standards. This is done using a Private Enterprise Number followed by Enterprise Data in a format defined for that Enterprise Number and Ent Type. Ent Type allows a Vendor PDU to be sub-typed in the event that the vendor/enterprise needs multiple PDU types. As with Encapsulation PDUs, a receiver of a Vendor PDU MUST respond with an ACK or an ERROR PDU. Similarly, a Vendor PDU MUST only be sent over an open session.
This section explores some trade-offs taken and some considerations.
A device may send IP packets an L3 interface which transmits data over a single Layer-2 (L2) interface or multiple L2 interfaces. Packets sourced by one L3 IP interface over multiple L2 should consider that an L3 interface with multiple Layer-2 interfaces could have many devices which might come at various times, therefore the configured HELLO PDU retransmit time SHOULD be set to a non-zero value, and periodic HELLOs should continue. Packets transmitted on a single L2 interface on a point-to-point (p2p) connection, MAY set the configuration value to zero, so once a TLS/TCP session is up, HELLOs are no longer desirable. A device with multiple Layer-2 interfaces, traditionally called a switch, may be used to forward frames and therefore packets from multiple devices to one Layer-3 interface, I, on an L3ND speaking device. Interface I could discover a peer J across the switch. Later, a prospective peer K could come up across the switch. If I was not still sending and listening for HELLOs, the potential peering with K could not be discovered. Therefore, on multi-link interfaces, L3ND MUST continue to send HELLOs as long as they are turned up.
One can think of the protocol as an instance (i.e. state machine) which runs on each logical link of a device. As the upper routing layer must view VLAN topologies as separate graphs, L3ND treats VLAN ports as separate links. As Sub-Interfaces each have their own layer-3 identities, they act as separate interfaces, forming their own links.
An implementation SHOULD provide the ability to configure each logical interface as L3ND speaking or not. An implementation SHOULD provide the ability to distribute one or more loopback addresses or interfaces into L3ND on an external L3ND speaking interface. An implementation SHOULD provide the ability to distribute one or more overlay and/or underlay addresses or interfaces into L3ND on an external L3ND speaking interface. An implementation SHOULD provide the ability to configure one of the addresses of an encapsulation as primary on an L3ND speaking interface. If there is only one address for a particular encapsulation, the implementation MAY mark it as primary by default. An implementation MAY allow optional configuration which updates the local forwarding table with overlay and underlay data both learned from L3ND peers and configured locally.
The protocol as is MUST NOT be used outside a datacenter or similarly closed environment without using TLS encapsulation which is based on a configured CA trust anchor. Many datacenter operators have a strange belief that physical walls and firewalls provide sufficient security. This is not credible. All DC protocols need to be examined for exposure and attack surface. In the case of L3ND, Authentication and Integrity as provided by TLS validated to a configured shared CA trust anchor is strongly recommended. It is generally unwise to assume that on the wire Layer-3 is secure. Strange/unauthorized devices may plug into a port. Mis-wiring is very common in datacenter installations. A poisoned laptop might be plugged into a device's port, form malicious sessions, etc. to divert, intercept, or drop traffic. Similarly, malicious nodes/devices could mis-announce addressing. If OPENs are not using validated TLS, an attacker could forge an OPEN for an existing session and cause the session to be reset. For these reasons, TLS SHOULD be used.
IANA is requested to assignment one address (TBD1) for L3DL-L3-LL from the IPv4 Multicast Address Space Registry from the Local Network Control Block (224.0.0.0 - 224.0.0.255 (224.0.0/24)). IANA is requested to assign one address (TBD2) for L3DL-L3-LL from the IPv6 Multicast Address Space Registry in the the IPv6 Link-Local Scope Multicast address (TBD:2).
This document requests the IANA to assign a well-known TCP Port Number (TBD3) to the L3 Neighbor Discovery Protocol for the following, see :
l3nd-server
This document requests the IANA create a registry for L3ND PDU Type, which may range from 0 to 255. The name of the registry should be L3ND-PDU-Type. The policy for adding to the registry is RFC Required per , either standards track or experimental. The initial entries should be the following:
PDU Code PDU Name ---- ------------------- 0 HELLO 1 reserved 2 OPEN 3 ACK 4 IPv4 Announcement 5 IPv6 Announcement 6 MPLS IPv4 Announcement 7 MPLS IPv6 Announcement 8-254 Reserved 255 Vendor
This document requests the IANA create a registry for L3ND PL Flag Bits, which may range from 0 to 7. The name of the registry should be L3ND-PL-Flag-Bits. The policy for adding to the registry is RFC Required per , either standards track or experimental. The initial entries should be the following:
Bit Bit Name ---- ------------------- 0 Announce/Withdraw (ann == 0) 1 Primary 2 Underlay/Overlay (under == 0) 3 Loopback 4-7 Reserved
This document requests the IANA create a registry for L3ND Error Codes, a 16 bit integer. The name of the registry should be L3ND-Error-Codes. The policy for adding to the registry is RFC Required per , either standards track or experimental. The initial entries should be the following:
Error Code Error Name ---- ------------------- 0 No Error 1 Checksum Error 2 Logical Link Addressing Conflict 3 reserved 4 Announce/Withdraw Error
The authors thank .
IANA Private Enterprise Numbers Clos Network