diff --git a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
index f40a930..b394164 100644
--- a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
+++ b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 <?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
 
 <rfc category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF"
-     docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-10" ipr="trust200902"
+     docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-11" ipr="trust200902"
      version="2" updates="4291">
 
 <front>
@@ -131,10 +131,11 @@ rate is low enough.
 
    <t>For host computers on local area networks, generation of interface
    identifiers is no longer necessarily bound to layer 2 addresses
-   (MACs) <xref target="RFC7217"/> <xref target="RFC8064"/>.  Therefore
-   their length, previously fixed at 64 bits <xref target="RFC7136"/>,
-   is in fact a variably-sized parameter as explicitly acknowledged in
-   Section 5.5.3(d) of <xref target="RFC4862"/> which states:
+   (MACs) <xref target="RFC7217"/> <xref target="RFC8064"/> <xref
+   target="I-D.chown-6man-tokenised-ipv6-identifiers"/>.  Therefore their length,
+   previously fixed at 64 bits <xref target="RFC7136"/>, is in fact a
+   variably-sized parameter as explicitly acknowledged in Section
+   5.5.3(d) of <xref target="RFC4862"/> which states:
 
    <list>
 
@@ -320,6 +321,7 @@ rate is low enough.
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7707.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7136.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7721.xml"?>
+    <?rfc include="reference.I-D.chown-6man-tokenised-ipv6-identifiers.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.I-D.jinmei-6man-prefix-clarify.xml"?>