randy/draft-classless6
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

drop 2119 language

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2017-05-09 10:09:14 +02:00
parent e8b242134c
commit b230b3b452
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
View file

@ -43,6 +43,8 @@
</abstract> </abstract>
<!--
<note title="Requirements Language"> <note title="Requirements Language">
<t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL <t>The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL
@ -54,6 +56,8 @@
</note> </note>
-->
</front> </front>
<middle> <middle>
@ -156,14 +160,14 @@ rate is low enough.
<section anchor="notes" title="Recommendations"> <section anchor="notes" title="Recommendations">
<t>For historical reasons, when a prefix is needed on a link, <t>For historical reasons, when a prefix is needed on a link,
barring other considerations, a /64 is RECOMMENDED <xref barring other considerations, a /64 is recommended <xref
target="RFC7136"/>.</t> target="RFC7136"/>.</t>
<t>The length of the Interface Identifier in Stateless Address <t>The length of the Interface Identifier in Stateless Address
AutoConfiguration <xref target="RFC4862"/> is a parameter; its AutoConfiguration <xref target="RFC4862"/> is a parameter; its
length SHOULD be sufficient for effective randomization for privacy length SHOULD be sufficient for effective randomization for privacy
reasons. For example, a /48 might be sufficient. But operationally reasons. For example, a /48 might be sufficient. But operationally
we RECOMMEND, barring strong considerations to the contrary, using we recommend, barring strong considerations to the contrary, using
64-bits for SLAAC in order not to discover bugs where 64 was 64-bits for SLAAC in order not to discover bugs where 64 was
hard-coded, and to favor portability of devices and operating hard-coded, and to favor portability of devices and operating
systems.</t> systems.</t>
@ -230,7 +234,9 @@ rate is low enough.
<back> <back>
<references title="Normative References"> <references title="Normative References">
<!--
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2119"?>
-->
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2450"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2450"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.2460"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2460"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?> <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291"?>