Merge branch 'master' of github.com:randyqx/classless6
merge brian's changes
This commit is contained in:
commit
a28d75db5d
2 changed files with 83 additions and 26 deletions
|
|
@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Network Working Group N. Bourbaki
|
||||
Internet-Draft The Intertubes
|
||||
Intended status: Standards Track May 9, 2017
|
||||
Expires: November 10, 2017
|
||||
Intended status: Standards Track May 10, 2017
|
||||
Expires: November 11, 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
IPv6 is Classless
|
||||
|
|
@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Status of This Memo
|
|||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
|
||||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
|
||||
|
||||
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 10, 2017.
|
||||
This Internet-Draft will expire on November 11, 2017.
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright Notice
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Copyright Notice
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 10, 2017 [Page 1]
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 1]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Table of Contents
|
|||
9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||||
9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
|
||||
9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||||
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
|
||||
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ Table of Contents
|
|||
|
||||
Some confusion has been caused by the IP Version 6 Addressing
|
||||
Architecture, [RFC4291], and the proposed changes in
|
||||
[I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis] with respect to the minimum subnet size.
|
||||
[I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis] with respect to the minimum subnet size.
|
||||
|
||||
Meanwhile, link prefixes of varied lengths, /127, /126, /124, /120,
|
||||
... /64 have been successfully deployed for many years. Having the
|
||||
|
|
@ -109,15 +109,16 @@ Table of Contents
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 10, 2017 [Page 2]
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 2]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
It is also assumed that the reader understands IPv6 [RFC2460], the IP
|
||||
Version 6 Addressing Architecture [RFC4291], the proposed changes to
|
||||
RFC4291 [I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis], and the recent recommendations
|
||||
for the generation of stable Interface Identifiers [RFC8064].
|
||||
RFC4291 [I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis] and RFC2464
|
||||
[I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis], and the recent recommendations for the
|
||||
generation of stable Interface Identifiers [RFC8064].
|
||||
|
||||
An important recent IPv6 development was that, for host computers on
|
||||
local area networks, the way in which interface identifiers were
|
||||
|
|
@ -130,9 +131,10 @@ Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
|||
|
||||
To state it simply, IPv6 unicast subnetting is based on prefixes of
|
||||
any valid length up to 128 except for links where an Internet
|
||||
Standard such as, for example, Stateless Address AutoConfiguration
|
||||
(SLAAC) [RFC4862], or Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router
|
||||
Links [RFC6164] is in use.
|
||||
Standard that has nothing to do with routing may impose a particular
|
||||
length. Examples are Stateless Address AutoConfiguration (SLAAC)
|
||||
[RFC4862], or Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links
|
||||
[RFC6164].
|
||||
|
||||
Nodes must always support routing on any valid network prefix length,
|
||||
even if SLAAC or other standards are in use, because routing could
|
||||
|
|
@ -163,9 +165,7 @@ Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 10, 2017 [Page 3]
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 3]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 10, 2017 [Page 4]
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 4]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -233,10 +233,15 @@ Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
|||
|
||||
9.2. Informative References
|
||||
|
||||
[I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis]
|
||||
Hinden, B. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
|
||||
Architecture", draft-hinden-6man-rfc4291bis-06 (work in
|
||||
progress), October 2015.
|
||||
[I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis]
|
||||
Crawford, M. and R. Hinden, "Transmission of IPv6 Packets
|
||||
over Ethernet Networks", draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis-02
|
||||
(work in progress), March 2017.
|
||||
|
||||
[I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis]
|
||||
Hinden, R. and S. <>, "IP Version 6 Addressing
|
||||
Architecture", draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07 (work in
|
||||
progress), January 2017.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC3587] Hinden, R., Deering, S., and E. Nordmark, "IPv6 Global
|
||||
Unicast Address Format", RFC 3587, August 2003.
|
||||
|
|
@ -265,6 +270,18 @@ Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
|||
RFC 7721, DOI 10.17487/RFC7721, March 2016,
|
||||
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7721>.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
Internet-Draft IPv6 is Classless May 2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Author's Address
|
||||
|
||||
Nicolas Bourbaki
|
||||
|
|
@ -277,4 +294,43 @@ Author's Address
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 10, 2017 [Page 5]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bourbaki Expires November 11, 2017 [Page 6]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<t>Some confusion has been caused by the IP Version 6 Addressing
|
||||
Architecture, <xref target="RFC4291"/>, and the proposed changes in
|
||||
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the
|
||||
<xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the
|
||||
minimum subnet size.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t>Meanwhile, link prefixes of varied lengths, /127, /126, /124,
|
||||
|
|
@ -98,7 +98,8 @@
|
|||
<t>It is also assumed that the reader understands IPv6 <xref
|
||||
target="RFC2460"/>, the IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture <xref
|
||||
target="RFC4291"/>, the proposed changes to RFC4291 <xref
|
||||
target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/>, and the recent
|
||||
target="I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"/> and RFC2464
|
||||
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis"/>, and the recent
|
||||
recommendations for the generation of stable Interface Identifiers
|
||||
<xref target="RFC8064"/>.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -130,8 +131,8 @@ rate is low enough.
|
|||
|
||||
<t>To state it simply, IPv6 unicast subnetting is based on prefixes
|
||||
of any valid length up to 128 except for links where an Internet
|
||||
Standard, that has nothing to do with routing, may impose a
|
||||
particular length. Examples are Stateless Address AutoConfiguration
|
||||
Standard that has nothing to do with routing may impose a
|
||||
particular length. Examples are Stateless Address AutoConfiguration
|
||||
(SLAAC) <xref target="RFC4862"/>, or Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on
|
||||
Inter-Router Links <xref target="RFC6164"/>.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ rate is low enough.
|
|||
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7707"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7136"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7721"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis"?>
|
||||
</references>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue