Merge branch 'master' of github.com:randyqx/classless6

merge brian's changes
This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2017-05-10 08:47:47 +02:00
commit a28d75db5d
2 changed files with 83 additions and 26 deletions

View file

@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
<t>Some confusion has been caused by the IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture, <xref target="RFC4291"/>, and the proposed changes in
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the
<xref target="I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the
minimum subnet size.</t>
<t>Meanwhile, link prefixes of varied lengths, /127, /126, /124,
@ -98,7 +98,8 @@
<t>It is also assumed that the reader understands IPv6 <xref
target="RFC2460"/>, the IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture <xref
target="RFC4291"/>, the proposed changes to RFC4291 <xref
target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/>, and the recent
target="I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"/> and RFC2464
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis"/>, and the recent
recommendations for the generation of stable Interface Identifiers
<xref target="RFC8064"/>.</t>
@ -130,8 +131,8 @@ rate is low enough.
<t>To state it simply, IPv6 unicast subnetting is based on prefixes
of any valid length up to 128 except for links where an Internet
Standard, that has nothing to do with routing, may impose a
particular length. Examples are Stateless Address AutoConfiguration
Standard that has nothing to do with routing may impose a
particular length. Examples are Stateless Address AutoConfiguration
(SLAAC) <xref target="RFC4862"/>, or Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on
Inter-Router Links <xref target="RFC6164"/>.</t>
@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ rate is low enough.
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7707"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7136"?>
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7721"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis"?>
</references>