randy/draft-classless6
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Streamline the text and add reference to RFC8064

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Fernando Gont 2017-05-06 09:22:22 +02:00
parent a32025128e
commit 73fc0b38a0
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
View file

@ -67,11 +67,10 @@
not apply to IPv6; but the arguments for operational flexibility in
address allocation remain compelling.</t>
<t>It is also assumed that the reader understands IPv6, <xref
target="RFC2460"/>, IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture, see <xref
target="RFC4291"/>, and the proposed changes to <xref
target="RFC4291"/>, see <xref
target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/>.</t>
<t>It is also assumed that the reader understands IPv6 <xref
target="RFC2460"/>, the IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture <xref
target="RFC4291"/>, the proposed changes to RFC4291 <xref
target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/>, and the recent recommendations for the generation of stable Interface Identifiers <xref target="RFC8064"/>.</t>
<!--
<t>NOTE: do we mean 4291bis (currently moribund) or 2464bis?</t>
@ -104,7 +103,7 @@ don't een need /64 for SLAAC, except for backward compatibility. (*)
<t>Some confusion has been caused by the IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture, <xref target="RFC4291"/>, and the proposed changes in
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the minimum subnet size</t>
<xref target="I-D.hinden-6man-rfc4291bis"/> with respect to the minimum subnet size.</t>
<t>Meanwhile, link prefixes of varied lengths, /127, /126, /124,
/120, ... /64 have been successfully deployed for many years.