From 7207f36b2f9d5e97c6f7979eb3646b2441e5b855 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 21:16:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] publish-09 with brian's addition

---
 draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
index 423f07b..fe4c525 100644
--- a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
+++ b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@
 <?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
 <?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
 
-<rfc category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-08" ipr="trust200902" updates="4291">
+<rfc category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF"
+     docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-09" ipr="trust200902"
+     version="2" updates="4291">
 
 <front>
 
@@ -232,6 +234,12 @@ rate is low enough.
     hard-coded, and to favor portability of devices and operating
     systems.</t>
 
+    <t>As most wireless operators give a single /64 to wireless clients,
+    subnetting beyond /64 is a real world requirement, and its absence
+    is an incentive to deploy network address translation for IPv6.  In
+    the long term this is a use case for supporting longer prefixes than
+    /64, in order to avoid NAT.</t>
+
     <t>Note that OpenBSD ships with SLAAC for lengths longer than
     /64.</t>