diff --git a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
index 4453048..91f7790 100644
--- a/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
+++ b/draft-nbourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6.xml
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 <?rfc tocindent="yes"?>
 <?rfc tocompact="yes"?>
 
-<rfc category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-06" ipr="trust200902" updates="4291">
+<rfc category="std" consensus="true" submissionType="IETF" docName="draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-07" ipr="trust200902" updates="4291">
 
 <front>
 
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@
     because of the strong risk of mis-implementation, which can easily
     result in serious operational problems.</t>
 
-    <t>This document also clarifies that IPv6 routing subnets may be of
-    any length up to 128.</t>
+    <t>This document also stresses that IPv6 routing subnets may be of
+    any length up to 128, see <xref target="RFC7608"/>.</t>
 
     </section>
 
@@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ rate is low enough.
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.2460.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4291.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7217.xml"?>
+    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7608.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.8064.xml"?>
     </references>
 
@@ -308,7 +309,6 @@ rate is low enough.
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.6164.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.3587.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.4632.xml"?>
-    <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7608.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7707.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7136.xml"?>
     <?rfc include="reference.RFC.7721.xml"?>