joel, nick, and nbourbaki change

This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2017-07-17 14:18:13 +02:00
parent 7c99c3d26b
commit 4786e3b8bf

View file

@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
<front> <front>
<title>IPv6 is Classless</title> <title>IPv6 is Classless</title>
<!--
<author fullname="Nicolas Bourbaki" initials="N." surname="Bourbaki"> <author fullname="Nicolas Bourbaki" initials="N." surname="Bourbaki">
<organization>The Intertubes</organization> <organization>The Intertubes</organization>
<address> <address>
@ -30,99 +29,6 @@
<email>bourbaki@bogus.com</email> <email>bourbaki@bogus.com</email>
</address> </address>
</author> </author>
-->
<author fullname="Randy Bush" initials="R.B." surname="Bush">
<organization>Internet Initiative Japan</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>5147 Crystal Springs</street>
<city>Bainbridge Island</city>
<region>Washington</region>
<code>98110</code>
<country>US</country>
</postal>
<email>randy@psg.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Brian Carpenter" initials="B. E." surname="Carpenter">
<organization abbrev="Univ. of Auckland"/>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Department of Computer Science</street>
<street>University of Auckland</street>
<street>PB 92019</street>
<city>Auckland</city>
<region/>
<code>1142</code>
<country>New Zealand</country>
</postal>
<email>brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Fernando Gont" initials="F." surname="Gont">
<organization>SI6 Networks / UTN-FRH</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Evaristo Carriego 2644</street>
<code>1706</code>
<city>Haedo</city>
<region>Provincia de Buenos Aires</region>
<country>Argentina</country>
</postal>
<phone>+54 11 4650 8472</phone>
<email>fgont@si6networks.com</email>
<uri>http://www.si6networks.com</uri>
</address>
</author>
<author initials="N" surname="Hilliard" fullname="Nick Hilliard">
<organization>INEX</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>4027 Kingswood Road</street>
<city>Dublin</city>
<code>24</code>
<country>Ireland</country>
</postal>
<email>nick@inex.ie</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Geoff Huston" initials="G" surname="Huston">
<organization abbrev="APNIC"/>
<address>
<email>gih@apnic.net</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Chris Morrow" initials="C." surname="Morrow">
<organization abbrev="GOOG">Google, Inc.</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>1600 Ampitheatre Parkway</street>
<city>Mountain View</city>
<region>California</region>
<country>United States of America</country>
</postal>
<email>morrowc@google.com</email>
</address>
</author>
<author fullname="Job Snijders" initials="J." surname="Snijders">
<organization abbrev="NTT">NTT Communications</organization>
<address>
<postal>
<street>Theodorus Majofskistraat 100</street>
<code>1065 SZ</code>
<city>Amsterdam</city>
<country>The Netherlands</country>
</postal>
<email>job@ntt.net</email>
</address>
</author>
<date /> <date />
@ -221,48 +127,41 @@ rate is low enough.
length, previously fixed at 64 bits <xref target="RFC7136"/>, is in fact length, previously fixed at 64 bits <xref target="RFC7136"/>, is in fact
a variably-sized parameter as explicitly acknowledged in Section a variably-sized parameter as explicitly acknowledged in Section
5.5.3(d) of <xref target="RFC4862"/> which states: 5.5.3(d) of <xref target="RFC4862"/> which states:
<list>
<list><t> <t>Note that a future revision of the address architecture
Note that a future revision of the address architecture [RFC4291] [RFC4291] and a future link-type-specific document, which will
and a future link-type-specific document, which will still be still be consistent with each other, could potentially allow for
consistent with each other, could potentially allow for an an interface identifier of length other than the value defined in
interface identifier of length other than the value defined in the the current documents. Thus, an implementation should not assume
current documents. Thus, an implementation should not assume a a particular constant. Rather, it should expect any lengths of
particular constant. Rather, it should expect any lengths of interface identifiers.</t>
interface identifiers. </list>
</t></list>
</t> </t>
</section> </section>
<section anchor="Problem" title="Problem reinforced by classful addressing"> <section anchor="Problem" title="Problem reinforced by classful addressing">
<t>
As IPv6 usage has evolved and grown over in recent years, it has
become evident that it faces several scaling and coordination problems.
These problems are analogous to allocation and coordination problems
that motivated IPv4 CIDR allocation and later abundant IPv4 PAT, they
include:
</t>
<t>As IPv6 usage has evolved and grown over in recent years, it has
become evident that it faces several scaling and coordination
problems. These problems are analogous to allocation and coordination
problems that motivated IPv4 CIDR allocation and later abundant IPv4
PAT, they include:
<list> <list>
<t> <t>Address allocation models for specific counts of fixed length
Address allocation models for specific counts of fixed length subnets subnets to downstream networks or devices from /48 down to /64 are
to downstream networks or devices from /48 down to /64 are based based on our imagination of how subnets are or should be allocated
on our imagination of how subnets are or should be allocated within within ipv4 networks.</t>
ipv4 networks. <t>Hierarchical allocation of fixed-length subnets requires
</t> coordination between lower / intermediate / upper network elements
<t> and has implict assumption that policies and size allocation at the
Hierarchical allocation of fixed-length subnets requires coordination top of the hierarchy will accomidate all use cases with fixed lenth
between lower / intermediate / upper network elements and has implict subnet allocation.</t>
assumption that policies and size allocation at the top of the hierarchy <t>Coordination with upstream network elements for the allocation of
will accomidate all use cases with fixed lenth subnet allocation.
</t>
<t>
Coordination with upstream network elements for the allocation of
fixed length subnets reveals topology and intent that may be private fixed length subnets reveals topology and intent that may be private
in scope and which amounts to permission to build a particular topology. in scope and which amounts to permission to build a particular
</t> topology.</t>
</list> </list>
</t>
</section> </section>
<section anchor="statement" title="Identifier and Subnet Length Statements"> <section anchor="statement" title="Identifier and Subnet Length Statements">
@ -355,11 +254,20 @@ rate is low enough.
</section> </section>
<!-- <section anchor="authors" title="Authors">
<section anchor="acknowledgments" title="Acknowledgments"> <t>The authors of this document are as follows:
<t>The authors wish to thank .</t> <list>
<t> Randy Bush, Internet Initiative Japan</t>
<t> Brian Carpenter, University of Auckland</t>
<t> Fernando Gont, SI6 Networks / UTN-FRH</t>
<t> Nick Hilliard, INEX</t>
<t> Geoff Huston, APNIC</t>
<t> Chris Morrow, Google, Inc.</t>
<t> Job Snijders, NTT Communications</t>
</list>
</t>
</section> </section>
-->
</middle> </middle>