suggestion to read jinmei-6man-prefix-clarify
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b5949edb2
commit
357281d158
2 changed files with 49 additions and 44 deletions
|
|
@ -194,6 +194,10 @@
|
|||
recommendation for the generation of stable Interface Identifiers
|
||||
<xref target="RFC8064"/>.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<t><xref target="I-D.jinmei-6man-prefix-clarify"/> is also worth
|
||||
reading to clarify uses of varying prefix lengths on a single
|
||||
link.</t>
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
<t>NOTE: do we mean 4291bis (currently moribund) or 2464bis?</t>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -348,6 +352,7 @@ rate is low enough.
|
|||
<?rfc include="reference.RFC.7721"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.hinden-6man-rfc2464bis"?>
|
||||
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.jinmei-6man-prefix-clarify"?>
|
||||
</references>
|
||||
|
||||
</back>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue