From 3ef2eab7d5f5ac554005651c51f2f1f6a86dc538 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Randy Bush Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 20:28:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] spell check --- draft-ymbk-bgp-discovery-layers.txt | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/draft-ymbk-bgp-discovery-layers.txt b/draft-ymbk-bgp-discovery-layers.txt index 4191edc..fe4fc62 100644 --- a/draft-ymbk-bgp-discovery-layers.txt +++ b/draft-ymbk-bgp-discovery-layers.txt @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 2.1. BGP is the Underlay - The assumedenvironment has BGP used as the underlay routing protocol + The assumed environment has BGP used as the underlay routing protocol in data center. 2.2. Some Requirements @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 endpoints. o Support using either a device's external interface or one of its loopback addresses for the BGP session endpoint. - o Support discoverery of the peers' ASs. + o Support discovery of the peers' ASs. o Agree on any BGP session authentication and parameters. o Enable Layer 3 link liveness detection, such as BFD. @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 IP addresses. o Each one's attributes, a deployment defined set, e.g.: leaf, spine, ice cream flavor, ... These attributes are arbitrary and - operator dependednt. No assumptions should be made, code points + operator dependent. No assumptions should be made, code points assigned,, etc. o Each one's layer three peering address(es), and o Other attributes required for BGP OPEN to succeed, e.g. @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 This is similar but not quite the sane as the needs of this IDR Design Team. E.g., L3DL is designed to meet more complex needs. - L3DL's reedecesor, LSOE, [I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe], was simpler and might + L3DL's predecessor, LSOE, [I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe], was simpler and might be a better candidate for adaptation. A week's work could customize the design for the IDR Design Team's needs. But ... @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 The principal problem would appear to be discovery at Layer-3, because one neither knows whether to use IPv4 or IPv6. This is exacerbated by the possibility of a potential peer not being on the - local subnet, and hence broadcast and simiar techniques may not be + local subnet, and hence broadcast and similar techniques may not be applicable. If one can assume point-to-point links , then discovery might try @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020 9. Discovery at Layer Seven - Peer discovery at Layer-7 requires application layer rendezcous + Peer discovery at Layer-7 requires application layer rendezvous mechanisms analogous to those used by LISP, [RFC6830] or the Bitcoin Protocol.