add l3dl signing

This commit is contained in:
Randy Bush 2020-05-25 20:39:28 -07:00
parent 04f7097506
commit 05c31f000b
2 changed files with 28 additions and 22 deletions

View file

@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
Which of these are really necessary could be discussed.
7.2. Layer-3 Discovery Protocol (L3dl)
7.2. Layer-3 Discovery Protocol (L3DL)
L3DL [I-D.ietf-lsvr-l3dl] is an ongoing development in the IETF LSVR
Working Group with the goals of discovering IP Layer-3 attributes of
@ -230,6 +230,9 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
o IP address, IPv4 or IPv6, and
o BGP Authentication.
L3DL and L3DL-ULPC have well-specified security mechanisms, see
[I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing].
This is similar but not quite the sane as the needs of this IDR
Design Team. E.g., L3DL is designed to meet more complex needs.
L3DL's predecessor, LSOE, [I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe], was simpler and might
@ -272,9 +275,6 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
reach the rendezvous. In a BGP centric deployment this could pose a
chicken and egg problem.
Rendezvous approaches may appeal to deployments which favor a central
control framework.
Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 5]
@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
Rendezvous approaches may appeal to deployments which favor a central
control framework.
On the other hand, those who favor distributed protocols will have
the classic worries about fragility, redundancy, reliability, etc.
@ -310,6 +313,11 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
and Liveness", draft-ietf-lsvr-l3dl-04 (work in progress),
May 2020.
[I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing]
Bush, R. and R. Austein, "Layer 3 Discovery and Liveness
Signing", draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing-01 (work in
progress), May 2020.
[I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc]
Bush, R. and K. Patel, "L3DL Upper Layer Protocol
Configuration", draft-ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc-03 (work in
@ -320,14 +328,6 @@ Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
Ethernet", draft-ymbk-lsvr-lsoe-03 (work in progress),
November 2018.
[RFC6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6830, January 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6830>.
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank .
@ -338,6 +338,15 @@ Bush Expires November 26, 2020 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Trade-offs in BGP Peer Discovery May 2020
[RFC6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The
Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6830, January 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6830>.
Appendix A. Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank .
Author's Address
Randy Bush
@ -370,15 +379,6 @@ Author's Address

View file

@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
</section>
<section anchor="l3dl" title="Layer-3 Discovery Protocol (L3dl)">
<section anchor="l3dl" title="Layer-3 Discovery Protocol (L3DL)">
<t>
L3DL <xref target="I-D.ietf-lsvr-l3dl"/> is an ongoing
@ -340,6 +340,11 @@
</list>
</t>
<t>
L3DL and L3DL-ULPC have well-specified security mechanisms, see
<xref target="I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing"/>.
</t>
<t>
This is similar but not quite the sane as the needs of this IDR
Design Team. E.g., L3DL is designed to meet more complex needs.
@ -453,6 +458,7 @@
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.acee-idr-lldp-peer-discovery"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ietf-lsvr-l3dl"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-ulpc"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ymbk-lsvr-l3dl-signing"?>
<?rfc include="reference.I-D.ymbk-lsvr-lsoe"?>
</references>